Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1 Ratings and Reviews
October 22nd, 2009 • Filed Under•71 views
The WX1 can capture ten 10.2 megapixel resolution images at up to 10fps with its mechanical shutter, helping to ensure that you capture the decisive moment. HD Movie mode lets you capture your memories in 720p high definition video. HD videos can be played back on your HDTV using component output cable (sold separately) or uploaded to Internet sharing sites to share with friends and family.
Index of Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1 Expert Reviews
- ImagingResource— “The Sony WX1 has some magic up its sleeve. Its new sensor sees better in low light and it can grab a handful of shots in the dark and composite them into an image you can’t capture with other cameras. Add Sweep Panorama to the picture and the Sony WX1 spells compact fun. However, the Sony WX1 was a little too compact for me, the battery cover springing open and the Mode dial turning at unexpected times. I also found the buttons too small and the small icons impossible to read in low light. If you’re in the same boat, consider the Sony WX1’s touchscreen sibling, the TX1.”
- CNET.uk— “What it really comes down to with the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1 is expectations. Just because Sony has used a sensor found in its high-end camcorders and a lens based on those from its Alpha dSLRs, should you expect excellent photo quality? It certainly sounds reasonable. But, in the end, the fun-to-use DSC-WX1 is still a point-and-shoot camera, capable of above-average photos under challenging conditions where most other snappers in its class fail.”
- Cameras.uk— “The Sony Cybershot DSC WX1 has features you don’t see on a typical, pocket camera. With features like a very high speed burst mode, a sweep panorama mode for landscapes and cityscapes, and a High Definition movies mode this camera definitely sets a high standard. Image quality is also very good.”
- GoodGearGuide—“This is not the fastest camera on the block. When you start the camera up it is poky enough that it can grind on your nerves, and when you shut the camera off it takes way too long also. However, its autofocus speed impressed us, plus it does make you select macro for shooting close ups, the WX1 does it on the fly, nice. The camera is a mixed bag while we liked its low light ability and the sweep panorama is cool but the above mentioned flaws keep it from getting a perfect rating.”
- DevHardware—”The WX1 impressed the reviewer. They indicated the average person just would not expect a compact with so much technology, but not so with this little camera. Packed with lots of shooting modes this camera makes the photographic experience fun and memorable.”
- DigitalCameraReview—”I really enjoyed using the WX1 and I captured some interesting images with it, but I also found the camera a bit frustrating – it sometimes appears to have been designed by a committee. On the one hand, the WX1 provides a lot of nifty features that were clearly added to appeal to more advanced shooters – it has a very good zoom that starts at a wide angle equivalent of 24mm, a manual White Balance mode, a 720p video mode, and enhanced low light shooting capabilities.”
- PhotographyBLOG—”Although cheaper than the TX1, $350 / £300 is still a lot to ask for the WX1 – after all, this is only a 10 megapixel point-and-shoot camera with no manual modes to speak of. Having said that, if you don’t need or want the ability to fully control your camera, then the Sony Cyber-shot WX1 makes an excellent choice. Its wealth of innovative hand-holding modes makes it easy to successfully shoot regular photos, panoramas, and particularly low-light images, an area where most compacts really struggle. It may only look like yet another compact camera, but the Sony WX1 delivers impressive results in a fun and easy way.”
- Digital Camera Resource Page—”I like its performance, well-implemented face and smile detection system, cool sweep panorama feature, and HD movie mode. However, the WX1’s disappointing image quality and so-so ergonomics coupled with the fact that it costs more than the DSC-W290 but has fewer features makes me think that your money could be better spent on another camera.”
If you are Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1 Users just add any comments 
here to share your Customer Reviews
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading ...Enjoyed this post?
Consider subscribing to our full feed RSS. You can also subscribe by email and have new posts sent directly to your inbox.
(4.50 out of 5)
If you think 4x is weak, why not just go back to the SX-20? See, there are no good 20x ...
Both are good brands. I'd check at CNET.com and see user reviews on each. Each model is different.
Comment by
Andrew Siew on 22 October 2009:
The Exmor technology has been around since the introduction of the Sony Alpha 700. The WX1, along with the TX1 attempts to use the same technology with an additional “back illumination” to provide consumer with better picture quality at low light conditions. Unfortunately, with the reduction of the size of the sensor (since there is no way Sony can put a APS-C sensor into a compact camera), the signal-to-noise ratio of the Exmor sensor seems to reduce as well. Therefore, for those of you out there who’s hoping to carry this camera in your pocket instead of lugging a full-sized DSLR across your shoulder, you’d be hugely dissapointed.
However, compared to cybershot cameras released just months ago, the reduction in picture noise is very obvious at higher ISO settings, given the size of the sensor is only about 7.59mm (smaller than your pinky). The picture does look cleaner even at high ISO settings (especially beyond ISO 800), although you will be able to observe evidence of noise reduction combined with the sensor’s noise at those levels.
The new software that allows the sensor to optionally quickly capture 6 consecutive frames also helps alot in noise and blurring reduction, however this feature ties up your camera for awhile, i.e. you won’t be able to shoot the next picture until the camera has superimposed all six images together. Also, since the 6 images are not taken at the same instant, you should not use this feature for moving objects. The end result is amazingly low noise and blur free images, even though the camera will have to choke up a bit to cough up those images for you.
The sweep panorama, although not new, is an interesting feature, but the quality of the images produced by this feature is generally not good enough for printing, due to misaligned edges caused by vertical hand movements. I have yet to try this feature with a tripod, but i believe the result may be better since the camera can make a true horizontal sweep. The resolution of the standard sweep is 4912×1080 and the resolution of the wide sweep is 7152×1080. It is quite obvious from the figures that the images are not particularly suitable for large prints, since the vertical resolution of the images is very low.
Also, when the DRO is set to DRO-plus (for increased gamma to reduce shadows in your shots), the maximum allowed ISO setting is only ISO 800. There is also some restriction on the ISO setting when you turn on the 10-frame high-speed burst, where the maximum allowed ISO is 800. Therefore, the high speed burst function is only suitable for places where there is enough light.
The camera is fantastically fast, except when it comes to processing images from the 10-frame burst mode (this camera does not perform continuous burst like older cybershots), even the process of superimposing six shots into a single frame is blazingly fast due to the bionz processor.
The video recording function is handy, encoding at MPEG4 at a maximum resolution of 1280×720 pixels, too bad the clips are restricted to about 2GB each (29 mins), making it impossible for you to shoot long continuous videos even if you had a whopping 16GB card. The camera allows optical zooming during recording.
DSLR users should take note that there is no Aperture Priority, Shuttle Priority and Manual Mode for this camera, as it is obvious that Sony has decided that this camera is going to be a pure point-and-shoot model. A pity considering that some of the older cybershot models did come with at least the Manual Mode where you can adjust the exposure time, aperture size and shuttle speed manually.
I haven’t had the chance to fully test out the features of this camera yet, but given Sony’s history with cybershots (beyond a high quality sensor and lens, they tend to take shortcuts here and there), potential buyers should really test this camera out at Walmart or Target and look for limitations and flaws which may end up as deal breakers before considering mail ordering from Amazon to avoid the hassle of returning it later. Also, the LCD screen is very shiny and a crazy fingerprint magnet, so you might want to get a screen protector to go with the camera.
Sample shots (including full zoom) of the camera have been uploaded at the customers’ image section to show the noise reduction effect of the Exmor-R sensor in combination with the bionz processor from base ISO (ISO 160) all the way to ISO 3200.
[Reply]
Comment by
Quick Ben on 22 October 2009:
I’m somewhat puzzled after reading several of the poor reviews for this camera. I’ve had this camera since the beginning of October, and I’ve taken a number of shots under various conditions, day and night. In some cases the results, day and night, were outstanding. In other cases they were less so. In no case have I had the problems described by those who have given the camera one, two or even three stars.
Now I suppose that it could simply be the case that my standards are lower than those writing strongly negative reviews. However, while not a “pixel peeper”, I do care about the quality of the image. My first camera was a Leica M2 that my grandfather gave to me. What a great camera. I spent a lot of happy days taking pictures with that camera. The prints that I developed were, imho, better than anything I’ve seen come out of a less than ultra high end DSLR. The Leica M2 was followed by a series of Nikon and Olympus SLR’s. I was still shooting film when the digital age rolled around. Until the WX1 my only concession to the digital shift was a FujiPix F30. It’s a fun camera, but I wanted something smaller for casual shooting. When I can afford it, I’ll get a DSLR to replace the SLR’s.
All of this is to say that I have some experience with photography, although I would not in any way consider myself a “serious” photographer. Measured in terms of that experience, the WX1 is a very good camera for its purposes. I bought it as a pocket camera that could take quality pictures, day or night. So far, that expectation has been satisfied. I also bought it for the HD video which I haven’t tried out yet.
I’ve been wondering whether my relative lack of familiarity with recent model digital cameras may explain the difference between my experience with the WX1 and the experience of others. When my grandfather gave me his camera, he emphasized that among the things that I needed to know in order to take good pictures was how the camera worked. I spent a lot of time familiarizing myself with the workings of the Leica. This made a big difference in the quality of the pictures that I took. Accordingly, before using the WX1, I downloaded and read the manuals in their entirety, trying to familiarize myself with the camera’s resources (of which there are quite a few and limits (of which there are also quite a few). I still haven’t figured out how best to use the WX1, but I learned for, example, that turning the DRO on or off made a substantial difference in IQ, as did learning the idiosyncracies of the white balance and the various settings that were automatically set in the various camera modes. I would say, and this may be a mark against it for many people, that the WX1 is not a “point and shoot” camera unless one is familiar with its workings, but when I read the negative comments I wonder if some of the issues complained of could be addressed through a better understanding of the camera. I been following several threads on the WX1 at an online camera forum. The complaints were loud and long about the picture quality of the WX1 daytime shots. Photos were posted that looked really bad. Photos were posted that looked really good. Most were the work of apparently accomplished photographers. Finally someone complained that the camera wouldn’t shoot over 800 in the handheld nighttime setting. Someone else said that they had no problem shooting at higher speeds in that setting. It turned out that the the problem was that in one case (the no greater than 800 case), the DRO was on. It also turned out that with the DRO turned off, many of the problems with the IQ of daytime shots were addressed. This doesn’t mean that someone with all the knowledge in the world of the camera’s capabilities and all the skill in the world at taking photographs might not conclude that they found shots taken with the WX1 were unacceptable. “De gustibus non est disputandum”. It also may be the case that someone might feel that taking a lot of time to figure out the workings of a camera is a waste of time. Still, this camera seems to me to have a lot of functionality that makes it worth the time learning how to use it properly.
[Reply]