Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6III USM
602 Views Category: Canon, Camera Lens
(1 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ...Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6III USM Lens Plus Information
Compact and lightweight 4x telephoto zoom lens ideal for shooting sports, portraits, and wildlife. The newly developed Micro USM makes autofocusing quicker and quieter. The improved zoom mechanism also makes zooming smoother. The front part of the zoom ring now sports a silver ring for a luxury touch.
With the addition of a Micro USM for faster and even quieter autofocus, this version of the EF 75-300mm is well-suited for sports and other applications requiring fast AF. The USM version shares the compact size, close focusing range, and accessory compatibility of the non-USM lens. For many advanced amateurs, the 75-300 range is ideal as a versatile entry into telephoto photography.
Canon EF 75-300mm Lens Professional Reviews:
- photozone reviewed the Canon 75-300mm lens and gave out”The performance of the Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 USM IS came as a total surprise. Unlike its predecessor the lens is capable to produce a very high performance throughout the zoom range without the significant drop in quality at 300mm typical for most consumer grade lenses in this range. It seems as if the new UD element helps to lift the optical quality significantly. Distortions, CAs as well as vignetting are also very respectable. So in terms of optical quality the EF 70-300mm IS can be almost described as a hidden Canon L lens. As much as it may promise here its build quality remains in line to what you can expect from a consumer grade lens and the small max.
All incoming search terms for this post
CANON 75-300mm 1.4-5.6Ⅲ (2) - EF 75-300 f4-5.6 III USM (1) - cannon ef 75-300mm lenses (1) - canon ef 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III USM (1) - site:www.digitalcameras-plus.com EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6III USM (1) - canon (1) -
Comments(1) | Add Comments |
One Comments so far
» You can leave a response or Feed for this Entry or Trackback .
leave a reply
|
|
I had this lens before I “turned” pro and it worked fine on my Elan 7. Image quality was good for a cheap consumer lens. Definately soft, but not excessively. On a digital SLR, however, this lens is complete and utter crap. Not a single shot was sharp. I don’t mean that they were soft; I mean that not a single shot was in focus and every shot was plagued by hideous noise and extremely poor resolution. In other words, not a single photo was usable. I ditched the lens for a 70-200 2.8L IS and couldn’t be happier. Conclusion: If you shoot film, this lens works fine. For digital, forget about it.