Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L USM lens Customer Reviews

288 Views Category: Lens Reviews
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (3 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

By David Liscio (Nahant, Ma USA)

Since most digital SLR cameras tend to squeeze the average wide-angle lens until it basically becomes useless in tight quarters, the Canon 16-35mm f2.8 goes a long way toward solving that problem. Even at 16mm, the lens performs admirably, and the auto-focus mechanism is fast, silent and flawless. Yes, it’s expensive, but a couple of picture sales will pay for it.

canon-ef-16-35mm-ultra-wide-angle-zoom-lens.jpg

By R. Kaufmann (San Diego CA USA)

Quick word of advice: if you buy the suggested B&W haze filter ($125, gulp), be aware that you have to use the tupperware-like lens cap supplied with the filter; there aren’t threads for the Canon lens cap. This is a feature, not a bug. And you should buy the filter: you really don’t want a $1400 lens to get a scratch on the front element, do you?Other than that: just echoing what others have already said. Fantastic lens from 16-24, perfectly OK from 24-35. This lens is one of the three zooms us full-frame shooters should always have in the bag: 16-35 f2.8 II, either the 24-70 or 24-105 IS, and a 70-200 or 70-300. 1.6X crop camera users are better served by the 10-22 EF-S.



  

Search The Search Engines for "Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L USM lens Customer Reviews":
Google | Yahoo! Search | MSN Search Beta | Gigablast | Ask Jeeves

All incoming search terms for this post

canon (2) - canon 16-35mm lens (1) -

Comments(0) | Add Comments |

There are No comments.

» You can leave a response or Feed for this Entry or Trackback .

leave a reply

Google